10G NIC performance: VFIO vs virtio
From KVM
We did some experiment trying to measure network performance overhead in virtualization environment, comparing between VFIO passthrough and virtio approaches.
Test Topology
2 Intel Grantley-EP platforms (Xeon E5-2697 v3) connected by 10G link; memory 96 G.
NIC: Intel 82599ES
Test Tool: iperf
OS: RHEL 7.1
Result summary
- In native environment, iperf can get 9.4 Gbps throughput. Since iperf is a SW packet generator and normal process shall it be, this a reasonable number.
- With VFIO passthrough, network performance is also 9.4 Gbps; i.e., we cannot observe overhead in virtualization environment with VFIO passthrough method, in context of typical SW network user application.
- With virtio approach, if proper configured (details see below), network performance can also achieve 9.4 Gbps.
Here is the details about each kind of configuration.
VFIO passthrough VF (SR-IOV) to guest
Requirements
- You NIC supports SR-IOV (how to check? see below)
- driver (usually igb or ixgb) loaded with 'max_vfs=<num>' (better to modinfo to check accurate parameter name)
- kernel modules needed: NIC driver, vfio-pci module, intel-iommu module
Check if your NIC supports SR-IOV
lspci -s <NIC_BDF> -vvv | grep -i "Single Root I/O Virtualization"
Assign the VF to a guest
Unbind from igbvf driver and Bind to VFIO driver
- unbind from previous driver (take igbvf device for example)
echo <vf_BDF> > /sys/bus/pci/device/<vf_BDF>/driver/unbind lspci -s <vf_BDF> -n //to get its number
//it will return like below
0a:13.3 0200: 8086:1520 (rev 01)
//8086 1520 is its numeric number
- bind to vfio-pci driver
echo 8086 1520 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/new_id
Now you can see this device is bound to vfio-pci driver lspci -s <vf_BDF> -k