VMchannel Requirements: Difference between revisions

From KVM
(+ note libguestfs is used)
m (typo)
Line 51: Line 51:
* via slirp <br>This implementation does exist upstream as "-net channel" http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--specify-vmchannel-as-a-net-option-td21911523.html
* via slirp <br>This implementation does exist upstream as "-net channel" http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH--specify-vmchannel-as-a-net-option-td21911523.html
** Again, based on networking so same drawbacks mentioned above apply
** Again, based on networking so same drawbacks mentioned above apply
** Currently used by [http://libguestfs.org libguestfs]]
** Currently used by [http://libguestfs.org libguestfs]

Revision as of 03:55, 26 June 2009

Requirements

  • We want an interface between the guest and the host
  • The channel is to be used for simple communication, like sharing of the clipboard between the user desktop and the guest desktop
    • For relatively low rate of data transfer -- a few MB/s
    • Events to be delivered to the guest, like 'shutdown', 'reboot', 'logoff'
    • Queries to the guest, like 'which users are logged in'
  • Survive live migration
  • Support for multiple agents (consumers of the data) on the guest
  • Multiple channels could be opened at the same time
  • In multi-channels case, one blocked channel shouldn't block communication between others (or one channel shouldn't hog all the bandwidth)
  • Stable ABI (for future upgrades)
  • Channel addressing
    • An agent in the guest should be able to find the channel it's interested in
  • Dynamic channel creation
  • Security
    • No threats to the host
    • Unprivileged user should be able to use the channel
  • Should work out of the box, without any configuration necessary on the part of the guest
  • Notifications of channels being added / removed (hotplugging)
  • An API inside qemu to communicate with agents in the guest


History

A few reasons why the obvious solutions do not work:

  • via the fully emulated serial device.
    • performance (exit per byte)
    • scalability - only 4 serial ports per guest
    • accessed by root only in the guest
  • via TCP/IP network sockets
    • The guest may not have networking enabled
    • The guest firewall may block access to the host IPs
    • Windows can't bind sockets to specific ethernet interfaces